5 Vital Things about Emptiness – emptiness is scary, until it isn’t. Once you find it as a natural state, you can then simply live
In I suggested that the heart "processed" thoughts and feelings (the Taoists believe that thought and feeling happen in the heart.) The point I wanted to make was that "grasping" (obsessing) over our thoughts and feelings led to a "full heart."
The problem with "empty of what?" is that much of Eastern thought is "about" one-pointedness, or . We’re so quick to label and judge — we want there to be "stuff" — we want to find our place in a universe of things.
Wayne: No rush on this – if the heart "wants / needs" to be empty, then empty of what? Jock: Empty of nothing …. nada. You phrase your question in terms of "something" [referred to by "what"] … but it’s not a something issue. Empty … that’s that. W: I think I made another leap here, given the premise that the heart is the "seat" of thought and feeling. J: Seat in the passive sense of being sat on … not in being anything … centre of everything, which is nothing, which is no place, since all is all … W: And still curious – empty of?? J: no object. empty of nothing = no thing. The "of" simply doesn’t apply … J: Had a further thought …. empty of … everything
We each look out through filters. Think of wearing red sunglasses. If you wear a pair, everything appears red, initially, and then our eyes adjust, and we "fail to notice" the red tint. Add to this that every single person on the planet is also wearing sunglasses, and each person has their own, specific colour. What appears, initially, red to me, appears green to you.
We fail to notice (this idea is attributed to R.D. Laing):
This "tint" to life explains simply why siblings, for example, remember common events differently. Different perspectives, different "tints." We often waste our lives trying to persuade others that our "tint" is the "correct" one. And think about what we say: "I explained it clearly and he just couldn’t see it."
Some are scared, some are neutral, some are comforted. The reaction (see point 1) is personal — in other words, emptiness isn’t anything — it’s not scary, or neutral, or comforting. It’s not a thing. It has no characteristics. It just is. "Empty … that’s that."
In Buddhism, there is one reality. The oneness is emptiness, which is the locus of the 10,000 things. We tend to think "real" and "unreal," but such dualities are simply labels. The things we see, and hear, and feel, are "just that."
This is important. When I realize that the essence of life is emptiness, I am (curiously) freed to simply experience. In the West, the term "flow" or "zone" has been attached to this sense of inter-being. When you are in the flow or in the zone, there is no time, no space, no separation. The sensation is of being water flowing along. Whatever is happening is just happening, elegantly.
I’m writing this, paradoxically, to encourage you to stop thinking about this stuff, about "who’s right, who’s wrong" and get back to being empty of the necessity to judge. And rather than split off into another mind game ("Boy, this mindfulness is sure better than…") to simply let yourself go. To experience without the colour commentary.
I’ll likely have a few pictures for you, from Down East. We have thousands of photos of past trips. Here’s the point: a picture is not what it captures. Real is real, pictures are pictures.
I see some people with cameras glued to their faces — so much so that their entire experience is framed through a view finder. So desperate are they to capture the moment, that they fail to notice that they are detached from the moment. They stare at the picture on the screen of their phone or camera, and say, "Wow! What a great photo!"
Real is engagement. The vista is mind-blowing, if I choose to simply see. The mountain is there to climb, the water to boat on or swim in. The people around us can be interacted with, touched, danced with.
A cleint was contemplating ending a relationship. She described the entire conversation to me (both sides!) complete with a "feeling analysis."
I suggested she go home, and start the conversation, and see what actually happened.
She cried, and said, "That’s scary!"
And real.
The riskiest thing we can do is make ourselves vulnerable by opening our hearts. Our almost universal lack of connection is due to resisting intimacy — hiding behind protective layers. Crossed arms, tight legs, closed minds, and shrunken hearts.
Opening requires doing. You don’t need permission, or techniques, or even "the right person." You can literally open your heart anywhere, any time. You simply breathe, look into someone’s eyes, and as one of Darbella’s Qi Giong teachers puts it, "Smile with your heart."
You don’t need a collection of , or really anything at all to be open-hearted. Just a sense of the "bigness" of openness.
You do, by doing!
What …
What is full? I am full What am I ? I am nothing
What is empty? I am empty What am I? I am everything
Well, short post this week, as we’re on the road (actually, on the plane coming home.) Keep in touch!